All debates
Total debates: 3,862
No description has been provided
Use any economic indicator you want. I won't provide a metric for "negative economic effect" because I leave that up to the debater. You can choose your own metric, but you will need to defend why it is a better metric than the ones I will use. Metrics should be used up to the date when this debate is accepted. When I say "so far" I mean up to the time when someone accepts this challenge.
See full description for definitions
Debate over Religious Text’s Violence
Há um ato de racismo quando um negro ofende outro negro?
Pro argues for the Protestant doctrine of Sola Scriptura, Con argues against the Protestant doctrine of Sola Scriptura.
No description has been provided
if u want adjustments, dm me. (っ◔◡◔)っ 🍔
CON CLAIMS: No god is a god with omnipotence.
Can both be true, or do they clash
Before the 1964 Civil Rights Act it was perfectly legal and constitutional for a state to make a preferential established religion and enforce it down into its municipalites and state jurisdiction. The idea of separation of church and state is so the government doesn't influence the church (ie History of Catholic Church) but instead church influences the state. The Federal Law would leave religious matters up to the state and stay out of religious affairs altogether.
Highly respected religious and non-religious prove ur believes r authentic and logical by ur grace
No description has been provided
No description has been provided
Hot debates
Nothing here